The GUI is well-architected, attractive and intuitive.Users cite three primary reasons for picking GitKraken over Sourcetree: Let's start with the more popular of the two Git GUIs: GitKraken. Teams that mix developers with long Git histories and individuals with only recent exposure will sometimes use both clients. Sourcetree is a question of GUI quality versus package features. Newer Git users, however, find the GUI logical and attractive.įor many users, the choice of GitKraken vs. Development teams with Git experience say GitKraken lacks the scope of features that Sourcetree offers. The goal was to create a strong, visual and useful GUI that ran on anything and supported easy extension. Users who adopted the product early in its life love it - one even described the tool as 'beautiful.' However, new Git users might find it awkward how the tool organizes steps into tasks and the ways the UI represents tasks.Īxosoft released GitKraken in 2015, after two developers created the tool during a vendor-sponsored experiment.

Sourcetree supports most Git-related tasks, which means you don't need to revert to the command line to do specialized things - but you can, if you choose. Users like the product's clean aesthetic and the logical approach it provides without compromising Git's power and value proposition. Atlassian has enhanced the tool - though some users say sparingly - since its introduction in 2013. Sourcetree is a simple, powerful Git GUI.

Two of the Git GUIs developers choose most often include Axosoft's GitKraken and Atlassian's Sourcetree both tools are open source and available with free versions.

There are more than a dozen Git GUI tools with different features and designs. A good Git GUI can be an equalizer - a way to ensure everyone works with the repository at comparable levels of skill and comfort.

Git repositories are usually central to team development.

Sourcetree app download